Research Ethics for the Social Sciences

MET524 Research Ethics for the Social Sciences

  • Topics


    The purpose of the course is to facilitate the development of students¿ research-ethical competence. The ethical requirements for researchers and research projects are continuously increasing, and ensuring proper research ethics is an integral part of research quality.

    The course will present issues, cases and perspectives on research ethics. The ethical challenges of the research projects of the course participants will be emphasized and students will present and discuss their own projects.

    The course will cover the following topics:

    • What is research ethics?
    • Ethical issues in the social sciences
    • Ethical standards, expectations and institutions in the social sciences
    • Safeguards and measures that can improve the ethical quality of research designs
    • Evaluation the ethical quality of research designs
    • Ethics in the publication process

  • Learning outcome

    Learning outcome

    Students should develop knowledge and skills related to

    (1) recognizing ethical issues and challenges in the various stages of the research process

    (2) developing research designs that are ethically justifiable

    (3) to carry out the research process in line with the ethical requirements and expectations of the field of research.

    After completion of the course, the student should be able to¿


    -Reflect on the nature of ethical issues in research

    - evaluate the ethical quality of research designs and how they can be improved from an ethical point of view

    - identify and manage relevant ethical issues


    - integrate research-ethical concerns in research design

    - carry out research and scholarly research work in line with the ethical standards and expectations of one¿s field

    - articulate and justify the ethical choices that are embedded in research designs and methodological choices

     General competence

    - engage in ethical dialogues about research ethics and research quality

    - participate in debates in the field in international forums

    - ensure that research designs are ethically justifiable

  • Teaching


    The course is taught as a combination of lectures, structured conversations, paper writing and presentation.

  • Required prerequisites

    Required prerequisites

    The course does not presuppose prior knowledge about ethics; however, basic ethical perspectives will not be presented in detail. Therefore, it is helpful if students have some rudimentary knowledge about ethical perspectives (e.g. utilitarianism, deontology/duty ethics, virtue ethics).

  • Requirements for course approval

    Requirements for course approval

    Course credit is based on active participation, including discussion and of selected parts of the course materials. Prior to the course, participants should

  • Assessment


    Written paper. Presentation of paper, as well as commentary on the paper presentation of one other student.

  • Grading Scale

    Grading Scale


  • Computer tools

    Computer tools


  • Semester



  • Literature


    Main reading:

    Briggle, A. and Mitcham, C. (2012). Ethics and Science: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Additional readings:

    Academy of Management (2011). `Academy of Management Code of Ethics¿, Academy of Management Journal, 54, 6.

    Benjamin, L.T. Jr. and Simpson, J.A. (2009). `The Power of the Situation: The Impact of Milgram¿s Obedience Studies on Personality and Social Psychology¿, American Psychologist, 64, 1.

    DeLorme, D.E., Zinkhan, G.M and French, W. (2001). `Ethics and the Internet: Issues Associated with Qualitative Research¿, Journal of Business Ethics, 33, 4.

    Fanelli, D. (2009). `How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A

    Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data¿, PLOS One, 4(5).

    Fujii, L. A. (2012). Research ethics 101: dilemmas and responsibilities.  Political Science & Politics45(04), 717-723.

    Harriman, S. and Patel, J. (2014). `The ethics and editorial challenges of internet-based research¿, BMC Medicine, 12.

    Kramer, A.D.I., Guillory, J.E. and Hancock, J.T. (2014). `Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks¿, Proceedings from the National Academy of Sciences, 111, 24.

    Mazar, N., & Ariely, D. (2015). Dishonesty in scientific research. The Journal of Clinical Investigation125(11), 3993-3996.


ECTS Credits
Teaching language
Spring, Autumn

Course responsible

Lars Jacob Tynes Pedersen, Department of Accounting, Auditing and Law