FIE442 Growth and Architecture of Financial Systems
Autumn 2018Spring 2019
Evidence accumulated over the last 15 years demonstrates that improvements in financial intermediation generate economic growth, both across countries and over time. We begin by surveying this literature and engaging with some of its subtleties - such as the relative merits of bank-based and market-based financial systems and the role of different legal systems in determining the level and pattern of investment.
We then consider bank-based systems in more depth. What are their strengths and weaknesses? How has the financial system and government regulation evolved to build on their strengths and offset their weaknesses? We investigate the distinctive roles of central banks, deposit banks, investment banks and universal banks in the system. We examine the causes and consequences of runs on individual banks as well as contagions between banks. We consider the merits of both "narrow banking" and "local banking", in terms of their efficiency, equity and stability. We examine the roles of local, national and international regulation (such as the Basel Accords).
We then move on to an analogous consideration of market-based financial systems, investigating the distinctive roles of stock markets, mutual funds and insurance companies. What is the impact of stock market micro-structure? Is there a rôle for regional stock markets? How should insurance companies be regulated?
The course will be largely empirical, drawing on both contemporary and historical evidence, but will be layered upon a theoretical skeleton.
- Students will understand the role of finance in generating economic growth.
- Students will understand how the architecture of financial systems impacts their effectiveness.
- Students will be able to understand and evaluate the information and arguments presented in research papers that examine the link between finance and growth, as well as the links between financial architecture and financial system performance.
- Students will be able to distinguish economically rational arguments from political rhetoric regarding the role and effectiveness of the financial system.
- Students will be able to lead an informed and coherent discussion about financial systems.
The format is a class discussion, in which all students are expected to fully participate every week; participation is graded on the basis of frequency and quality. Students are encouraged to work in small groups to prepare for each class. Each week, every group member should read (at least) one of the items on the reading list and then discuss it with the rest of the group. In this way, all - or most - of the reading materials assigned each week will be covered by every group before the class. The group can use this discussion to prepare their responses to the accompanying assignment questions, which we will discuss in class.
Class participation (30%): graded A-F.
Written 3-hour School exam (70%) : graded A-F.
All answers must be written in English.
Class participation is graded on a scale of A - F. This comprises 30% of the overall grade.
The final exam is graded on a scale of A - F. This comprises 70% of the overall grade.
The two component grades are aggregated to produce an overall grade on a scale of A - F.
First, each week's class discussion will revolve around a business case; the case collection should therefore be purchased by students, using the link to the course pack on the Harvard Business School Publishing website. Second, the cases will be supplemented each week by a selection of research papers that are freely downloadable from the web. Third, background information is available in a standard investments textbook.
The collection of Harvard Business School cases; the collection of research papers.
Occasionally, students may want to do some background reading from the textbook Investments by Zvi Bodie, Alex Kane and Alan J. Marcus (10th edition, McGraw Hill, 2014).
- ECTS Credits
- Teaching language
Liam Brunt, Department of Economics