Tungodden presents at University of Reading
On 20 February, The Choice Lab Researcher Bertil Tungodden presents the paper “The boys crisis: Do we consider it more acceptable when males fall behind than when females do?”
The article is joint work with The Choice Lab researcher Alexander W. Cappelen and PhD student Ranveig Falch, and the presentation at is part of the seminar series of the Department of Economics at the University of Reading.
Read more about the study in this NHH news article, or find the abstract below.
It is well established that there is a gender bias in top-level jobs where males dominate. However, there is also an increasing worry of a gender bias in the lower tale of education and labor market outcomes, often termed the 'boys crisis'. What can explain these patterns? In this project, we study experimentally whether people consider it more acceptable when males fall behind than when females do, using a novel design implemented on a representative sample of Americans. The participants make distributive choices involving males and females and we randomly manipulate the gender composition in the distributive situations. We show that people find it more acceptable when males fall behind than when females do when outcomes reflect merit. We provide evidence showing that this result is not driven by a general preference for females, but is specific to how people redistribute in merit environments where males perform worse than females. We argue that this finding may shed light on the gender discrimination against males in different parts of society.