Payoff Comprehension, Time Pressure and Cooperation:Testing the Social Heuristics Hypothesis

Torsvik's info page aT UiO

Abstract:
Does reflection foster cooperation in social dilemmas? According to the Social Heuristics Hypothesis it does not; more thinking implies less cooperation. The empirical results, which often use time pressure to constrain thinking, are mixed. In this paper we combine a lab experiment with a re-analysis of previous studies to shed new light on the existing literature on reflection and cooperation. Our analysis suggests two main explanations for the mixed findings i) The effect of time pressure is contingent on payoff comprehension, which varies a lot across studies, ii) the true effect of time pressure is likely to be quite small, which means that individual studies are underpowered to detect an effect. Together, these two features can help account for the discrepancies in results reported in this literature.

Centre for Experimental Research on Fairness, Inequality and Rationality (FAIR) is a unique platform for collaboration between the Centre for Empirical Labour Economics and The Choice Lab.

FAIR collaborates with internationally leading researchers from different social sciences and philosophy, including Nobel Laureate James Heckman, John Bates Clark medal winner Matthew Rabin, and ERC Advanced Grant recipients Armin Falk, Ernst Fehr, and Kenneth Hugdahl. A number of the outstanding scholars have positions at FAIR and are strongly committed to take an active part in the research activities at FAIR. FAIR has a number of outstanding institutional partners on the different projects.

All activities at FAIR